<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.publicknowledge.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Issue: Broadband</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/issues/broadband/items</link>
 <description>All items filed with this issue.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Federal-State Joint Conference on Advanced Services Meeting on Broadband Policy</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1782</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;dates&quot;&gt;
    &lt;p class=&quot;first&quot;&gt;
    &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;date-single&quot;&gt;November 6, 2008 - 9:00am  US/Pacific&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Fairmont Hotel San Jose&lt;br /&gt;
170 South Market Street&lt;br /&gt;
San Jose, CA 95113-2307&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Federal Communications Commission todayannounced that the Federal-State Joint Conference on Advanced Services will hold a meeting on broadband policy Thursday, November 6, 2008 at the Wireless Communications Association International’s 14th Annual Symposium and Business Expo at the Fairmont Hotel in San Jose, California.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fcc">FCC</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:38:36 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Webmaster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1782 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Broadband Data Bill Faces Implementation Hurdles</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1780</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Sometime next year, the new Administration will start to figure out a plan for collecting information about where broadband is, and how to increase deployment.  The delay will be necessary because while Congress passed the bill to improve broadband data collection, &lt;a href=&quot;http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&amp;amp;docid=f:s1492rfh.txt.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;S. 1492&lt;/a&gt;, there isn’t any money actually set aside to pay for the program.   Until appropriations bills are passed for the next fiscal year, FY 2010, which starts Oct. 1, 2009, there won’t be any money.   As a result, it could be calendar year 2010 before any program gets going.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The bill is a worthwhile first step, because it puts Congress on record as wanting more information about broadband.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1780&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1780#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:59:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Art Brodsky</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1780 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Limits of &#039;Unlimited&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1724</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to Comcast and Verizon/AT&amp;amp;T, we now know a little more about the limits of “unlimited.”&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Comcast announced that, starting Oct. 1, it will impose a 250 GB cap on usage.  At the moment, the announcement is relatively benign, although there are lots of dangers lurking in the weeds.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Comcast has long complained that it needs to engage in legitimate “network management,” as opposed to the management techniques the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) found not to be so legitimate.  One of the meat-cleaver approaches would be to lower the demands on the network as a whole.  However, this new cap doesn’t appear to help Comcast meet its network management challenges.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1724&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1724#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:02:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Art Brodsky</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1724 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comcast Embarrasses the &#039;Free Market&#039; Once Again</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1719</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It didn’t take Comcast long to run away from its latest embarrassment.  On Wednesday, Comcast Senior Vp Mitch Bowling told Bloomberg News that in an effort to control traffic, Comcast might slow down the transmission of packets from its heaviest users by “10 minutes to 20 minutes.”  Here’s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;amp;sid=aCyJNA18k1dY&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;story.&lt;/a&gt;  PC Magazine had the same &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2328581,00.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;story.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1719&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1719#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:55:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Art Brodsky</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1719 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Higher Ed Needs an IT Policy Task Force</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1709</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1137&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;second&lt;/a&gt; straight year, I addressed the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sce.cornell.edu/exec/programs.php?v=12185&amp;amp;s=Overview&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EDUCAUSE/Cornell Institute for Computer Policy and Law&lt;/a&gt;, held at Cornell’s beautiful campus.  The Institute gathers 50+ higher education information technology (IT) professionals – usually campus CTOs, librarians and legal counsels, and teaches them the substantive particulars of IT policy issues and advises them how to be strong advocates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1709&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1709#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/filtering">Filtering</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/intellectual-property">Intellectual Property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/p2p">P2P</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/piracy">Piracy</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:11:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gigi Sohn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1709 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Free Press, et al. Reply to Comcast’s Argument With Regard to CBS v. FCC</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1696</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The full filing is available in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/pdf/freepress-etal-exparte-20080728.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PDF format&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Before the&lt;br /&gt;
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION&lt;br /&gt;
Washington, DC 20554&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the Matter of&lt;br /&gt;
Free Press, &lt;em&gt;et al.&lt;/em&gt; Petition for Declaratory Ruling&lt;br /&gt;
Broadband Industry Practices&lt;br /&gt;
WC Docket No. 07-52&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To: The Commission&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;REPLY TO COMCAST’S ARGUMENT WITH REGARD TO &lt;em&gt;CBS v. FCC&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Media Access Project, on behalf of Free Press, &lt;em&gt;et al.&lt;/em&gt;, files these further written &lt;em&gt;ex parte&lt;/em&gt; comments in response to the written &lt;em&gt;ex parte&lt;/em&gt; filed by Comcast on July 24, 2008.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1696&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/taxonomy/term/92">FCC</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Webmaster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1696 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Comcast Cares…In a Vaguely Creepy Sort of Way</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1679</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s no secret that &lt;a href=&quot; http://www.comcast.com/&quot;&gt;Comcast&lt;/a&gt; is a company with a bit of an image problem. If you&#039;re a regular reader of this blog, chances are that you already know this, given &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/issues/comcastcomplaint&quot;&gt;the frequency with which Comcast is discussed around these parts&lt;/a&gt;. And even if you&#039;re not a policy geek, chances are fairly high that you see America&#039;s largest cable company in a less than favorable light. &lt;a href=&quot; http://www.theacsi.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=180&amp;amp;Itemid=186&quot;&gt;As the most recent American Customer Satisfaction Index survey reveals&lt;/a&gt;, Comcast is one of the least trusted cable providers out there. So you can&#039;t blame the company for attempting to rehabilitate its image in the eye of the consumer…or can you? Today, Comcast found itself in hot water with consumer advocates yet again, over a controversial response to online complaints. For once, however, I&#039;m siding with Comcast. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1679&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1679#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:37:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mehan Jayasuriya</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1679 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Connected Nation&#039;s Private Interests Hit In FCC Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1675</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) rulemaking on collecting broadband data has brought some of the critics of Connect Kentucky/Connected Nation to the fore, while challenging the semi-sacred status of the “public-private partnership.”&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In recent comments filed with the Commission, the arguments on who should map broadband deployment fall into two categories. One side is those of Connect and its allies in the telephone companies, cable companies and labor.  The other is the one made up of public agencies and publicly owned utilities which are wary of too much of the “private” side taking over the equation.  The Kentucky Public Service Commission (PSC) and the American Public Power Association (APPA), led by their Kentucky members, are in the forefront.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1675&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1675#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:12:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Art Brodsky</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1675 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Little Competition Never Hurt Anyone or How I Halved my Comcast Bill in Five Minutes With a Little Help From Verizon</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1663</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.comcast.com/&quot;&gt;Comcast&lt;/a&gt; cable television and Internet customer for almost two years now. And to be quite honest, during those two years, I&#039;ve had relatively few complaints. Sure, I&#039;m not crazy about &lt;a href=&quot; http://www.publicknowledge.org/issues/comcastcomplaint&quot;&gt;my upstream BitTorrent traffic getting throttled&lt;/a&gt;. But that aside, I feel as if I&#039;ve always enjoyed a fairly high level of service. I&#039;m more or less pleased with the speeds that I get with my Internet connection, the picture and sound quality of my cable television service is high enough to pass muster and I can&#039;t remember ever experiencing any downtime (which initially came as a shock, after having been a DSL customer for a number of years). And all those horror stories about Comcast technicians? Mine arrived right on time for my installation appointment and was both courteous and helpful--even if he did try to sell me a cable descrambler box. In fact, during the last few years, I&#039;ve only had one complaint regarding Comcast&#039;s Internet service: the price tag that comes attached to it has always seemed a bit high. As of yesterday, however, that&#039;s no longer an issue for me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1663&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1663#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:28:26 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mehan Jayasuriya</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1663 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>BT and Ofcom</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1660</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;About 16 months ago, I heard Ed Richards of Ofcom speak at a CITI conference at Columbia, and blogged about it &lt;a href=&quot;http://scrawford.net/blog/ed-richards-ofcom/907/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.   I remember thinking that Richards didn’t seem to think that highspeed access to the internet was all that important.  The market had to demand it, and the market wasn’t being demanding.  Also, he wasn’t interested in government intervention to support highspeed access.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1660&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1660#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/broadband">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/information-policy">Information Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:34:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Susan Crawford</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1660 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
