Key Issues : FCC's Open Internet Rules

Most recent activity:

On December 21, 2010, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted in favor of an order that establishes rules of the road to preserve the open Internet.

Public Knowledge’s Position

There are several glaring shortcomings of the FCC’s rules, including the absence of strong protections for wireless Internet connections. Furthermore, the rules do not provide certainty, but instead provide a path for further litigation and continued debate over Net Neutrality.

Despite these flaws, the rules still provide basic consumer protections that we believe will help to preserve an open Internet.

Public Knowledge will continue to defend and advocate for enforceable rules of the road to prevent Internet access providers from picking winners and losers online before consumers can do so themselves.

Public Knowledge is

  • against paid prioritization, which is not explicitly prohibited by the rules, and
  • in favor of strong protections on wireless broadband connections as well as wireline.

What you can do to help

  • Subscribe to our email list for updates on hot issues and events.
  • Donate to Public Knowledge to help us keep our doors open.
  • Give policy makers a piece of your mind: act now.

For more information

stdClass Object ( [nid] => 6113 [type] => issue [language] => [uid] => 1 [status] => 1 [created] => 1318263627 [changed] => 1343243502 [comment] => 0 [promote] => 0 [moderate] => 0 [sticky] => 0 [tnid] => 0 [translate] => 0 [vid] => 6174 [revision_uid] => 3459 [title] => FCC's Open Internet Rules [body] =>

On December 21, 2010, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted in favor of an order that establishes rules of the road to preserve the open Internet.

Public Knowledge’s Position

There are several glaring shortcomings of the FCC’s rules, including the absence of strong protections for wireless Internet connections. Furthermore, the rules do not provide certainty, but instead provide a path for further litigation and continued debate over Net Neutrality.

Despite these flaws, the rules still provide basic consumer protections that we believe will help to preserve an open Internet.

Public Knowledge will continue to defend and advocate for enforceable rules of the road to prevent Internet access providers from picking winners and losers online before consumers can do so themselves.

Public Knowledge is

  • against paid prioritization, which is not explicitly prohibited by the rules, and
  • in favor of strong protections on wireless broadband connections as well as wireline.

What you can do to help

  • Subscribe to our email list for updates on hot issues and events.
  • Donate to Public Knowledge to help us keep our doors open.
  • Give policy makers a piece of your mind: act now.

For more information

[log] => [revision_timestamp] => 1343243502 [format] => 2 [name] => admin [picture] => files/pictures/picture-1.jpg [data] => a:7:{s:15:"googleanalytics";a:1:{s:6:"custom";i:0;}s:7:"contact";i:0;s:14:"picture_delete";i:0;s:14:"picture_upload";s:0:"";s:13:"form_build_id";s:37:"form-7305fc15609b6291d5b44eb2e6d9475a";s:9:"nodewords";a:9:{s:8:"abstract";a:1:{s:5:"value";s:0:"";}s:9:"canonical";a:1:{s:5:"value";s:0:"";}s:9:"copyright";a:1:{s:5:"value";s:0:"";}s:11:"description";a:1:{s:5:"value";s:0:"";}s:8:"keywords";a:1:{s:5:"value";s:0:"";}s:13:"revisit-after";a:1:{s:5:"value";s:1:"1";}s:6:"robots";a:2:{s:5:"value";a:6:{s:9:"noarchive";i:0;s:8:"nofollow";i:0;s:7:"noindex";i:0;s:5:"noodp";i:0;s:9:"nosnippet";i:0;s:6:"noydir";i:0;}s:11:"use_default";i:0;}s:8:"dc.title";a:1:{s:5:"value";s:0:"";}s:8:"location";a:2:{s:8:"latitude";s:0:"";s:9:"longitude";s:0:"";}}s:14:"wysiwyg_status";a:1:{i:7;i:7;}} [path] => issues/fccs-open-internet-rules [print_display] => 1 [print_display_comment] => 0 [print_display_urllist] => 1 [print_mail_display] => 1 [print_mail_display_comment] => 0 [print_mail_display_urllist] => 1 [print_pdf_display] => 1 [print_pdf_display_comment] => 0 [print_pdf_display_urllist] => 1 [last_comment_timestamp] => 1318263627 [last_comment_name] => [comment_count] => 0 [taxonomy] => Array ( [85] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 85 [vid] => 5 [name] => Broadband [description] => [weight] => 0 ) [62] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 62 [vid] => 5 [name] => Network Neutrality [description] => [weight] => 0 ) [152] => stdClass Object ( [tid] => 152 [vid] => 5 [name] => Wireless [description] => [weight] => 0 ) ) [files] => Array ( ) [iids] => Array ( ) [page_title] => [nodewords] => Array ( [abstract] => Array ( [value] => ) [canonical] => Array ( [value] => ) [copyright] => Array ( [value] => ) [dc.contributor] => Array ( [value] => ) [dc.creator] => Array ( [value] => ) [dc.date] => Array ( [value] => Array ( [month] => 10 [day] => 10 [year] => 2011 ) ) [dc.title] => Array ( [value] => ) [description] => Array ( [value] => ) [keywords] => Array ( [value] => ) [location] => Array ( [latitude] => [longitude] => ) [pics-label] => Array ( [value] => ) [revisit-after] => Array ( [value] => 1 ) [robots] => Array ( [value] => Array ( [noarchive] => 0 [nofollow] => 0 [noindex] => 0 [noodp] => 0 [nosnippet] => 0 [noydir] => 0 ) [use_default] => 0 ) ) [build_mode] => 0 [readmore] => 1 [content] => Array ( [print_links] => Array ( [#weight] => -101 [#suffix] => [#value] => [#prefix] => [#title] => [#description] => [#printed] => 1 ) [#content_extra_fields] => Array ( [title] => Array ( [label] => Title [description] => Node module form. [weight] => -5 ) [body_field] => Array ( [label] => Body [description] => Node module form. [weight] => 0 [view] => body ) [revision_information] => Array ( [label] => Revision information [description] => Node module form. [weight] => 20 ) [author] => Array ( [label] => Authoring information [description] => Node module form. [weight] => 20 ) [options] => Array ( [label] => Publishing options [description] => Node module form. [weight] => 25 ) [comment_settings] => Array ( [label] => Comment settings [description] => Comment module form. [weight] => 30 ) [menu] => Array ( [label] => Menu settings [description] => Menu module form. [weight] => -2 ) [taxonomy] => Array ( [label] => Taxonomy [description] => Taxonomy module form. [weight] => -3 ) [path] => Array ( [label] => Path settings [description] => Path module form. [weight] => 30 ) [attachments] => Array ( [label] => File attachments [description] => Upload module form. [weight] => 30 [view] => files ) [image_attach] => Array ( [label] => Attached images [description] => Image Attach module form. [weight] => 0 ) [itunes] => Array ( [label] => iTunes feed information [description] => iTunes specific information. [weight] => 0 ) [page_title] => Array ( [label] => Page Title [description] => Page Title form. [weight] => -4 ) [path_redirect] => Array ( [label] => URL redirects [description] => Path redirect module listing [weight] => 30 ) [print] => Array ( [label] => Printer, e-mail and PDF versions [description] => Print module form. [weight] => 30 ) [xmlsitemap] => Array ( [label] => XML sitemap [description] => XML sitemap module form [weight] => 30 ) [nodewords] => Array ( [label] => Meta tags [description] => Meta tags fieldset. [weight] => 10 ) ) [#pre_render] => Array ( [0] => content_alter_extra_weights ) [body] => Array ( [#weight] => 0 [#value] =>

On December 21, 2010, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted in favor of an order that establishes rules of the road to preserve the open Internet.

Public Knowledge’s Position

There are several glaring shortcomings of the FCC’s rules, including the absence of strong protections for wireless Internet connections. Furthermore, the rules do not provide certainty, but instead provide a path for further litigation and continued debate over Net Neutrality.

Despite these flaws, the rules still provide basic consumer protections that we believe will help to preserve an open Internet.

Public Knowledge will continue to defend and advocate for enforceable rules of the road to prevent Internet access providers from picking winners and losers online before consumers can do so themselves.

Public Knowledge is

  • against paid prioritization, which is not explicitly prohibited by the rules, and
  • in favor of strong protections on wireless broadband connections as well as wireline.

What you can do to help

  • Subscribe to our email list for updates on hot issues and events.
  • Donate to Public Knowledge to help us keep our doors open.
  • Give policy makers a piece of your mind: act now.

For more information

[#title] => [#description] => [#printed] => 1 ) [#title] => [#description] => [#children] =>

On December 21, 2010, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted in favor of an order that establishes rules of the road to preserve the open Internet.

Public Knowledge’s Position

There are several glaring shortcomings of the FCC’s rules, including the absence of strong protections for wireless Internet connections. Furthermore, the rules do not provide certainty, but instead provide a path for further litigation and continued debate over Net Neutrality.

Despite these flaws, the rules still provide basic consumer protections that we believe will help to preserve an open Internet.

Public Knowledge will continue to defend and advocate for enforceable rules of the road to prevent Internet access providers from picking winners and losers online before consumers can do so themselves.

Public Knowledge is

  • against paid prioritization, which is not explicitly prohibited by the rules, and
  • in favor of strong protections on wireless broadband connections as well as wireline.

What you can do to help

  • Subscribe to our email list for updates on hot issues and events.
  • Donate to Public Knowledge to help us keep our doors open.
  • Give policy makers a piece of your mind: act now.

For more information

[#printed] => 1 ) [links] => Array ( [print_html] => Array ( [href] => print/6113 [title] => Printer-friendly version [attributes] => Array ( [title] => Display a printer-friendly version of this page. [class] => print-page [rel] => nofollow ) [html] => [query] => ) ) )