<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.publicknowledge.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Issue: Text Message Petition</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/issues/text-message-petition/items</link>
 <description>All items filed with this issue.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>A Little Reminder Why The PK Petition On Mobile Texting And Short Codes Matters</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1705</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Today&amp;#8217;s NYT has &lt;a href=&quot;//www.nytimes.com/2008/08/13/opinion/13graff.html?ex=1376280000&amp;amp;en=756f947ab1799ac3&amp;amp;ei=5124&amp;amp;partner=permalink&amp;amp;exprod=permalink&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this op ed&lt;/a&gt; on Obama&amp;#8217;s use of text messaging to announce his VP pick.  It provides a nice reminder about the importance of the pending  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/issues/text-message-petition&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Petition by PK and others&lt;/a&gt; on text messaging.  Not that Verizon or any other provider would be so foolish as to deny the Obama or McCain campaigns short codes or block their messages.  I&amp;#8217;m not even worried about independent candidates like Barr and Nader.  No, I&amp;#8217;m worried about us ordinary schlubs or unpopular folks who can&amp;#8217;t count on getting a front page story on the NYT if something happens.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To quickly review the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wetmachine.com/totsf/item/898&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NARAL flap&lt;/a&gt; that prompted the filing of the Petition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1705&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1705#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/txtsms">TXT/SMS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/information-policy">Information Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:00:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Harold Feld</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1705 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Feed the Animals: the FCC Holds Court in Pittsburgh</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1674</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myspace.com/girltalkmusic&quot;&gt;Girl Talk&lt;/a&gt; a.k.a. Pittsburgh-based mashup artist Greg Gillis, has been making waves in both the electronic/dance and indie rock communities for a few years now. Specializing in sample-based DJ mixes, Gillis creates music that is dense, tirelessly referential and thoroughly postmodern. His breakthrough album, 2006&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Night Ripper&lt;/em&gt;, proved that a well-executed mashup can have a life beyond the Internet and his latest release, the pay-what-you-want, Creative Commons licensed &lt;a href=&quot;http://74.124.198.47/illegal-art.net/__girl__talk___feed__the__anima.ls___/&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Feed the Animals&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, seems poised to push even further into the mainstream. Gillis has become quite the hot topic as of late and his name often pops up in the virtual pages of publications like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Pitchfork&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://stereogum.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Stereogum&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, as DJs in clubs around the country shamelessly try to imitate his style. One place where you might not expect to hear Gillis mentioned, however, is in the corridors of power on Capitol Hill. Despite this fact, not only did Gillis&#039; name pop up twice this week during Congressional and FCC hearings but on both occasions he was held up as exemplifying a new breed of creative professional. Welcome to yet another week in the increasingly scattershot world of D.C. tech policy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1674&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1674#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/txtsms">TXT/SMS</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:24:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mehan Jayasuriya</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1674 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Public Knowledge Raises Concerns Over Verizon Wireless Purchase of Alltel</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1599</link>
 <description>&lt;strong&gt;For Immediate Release: &lt;span class=&quot;date-single&quot;&gt;June 5, 2008&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following statement is attributed to Gigi B. Sohn, president and co-founder of Public Knowledge:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;The Verizon Wireless purchase of Alltel raises serious questions for consumers that will have to be addressed through antitrust analysis, and through public-interest conditions by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1599&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/spectrum-reform">Spectrum Reform</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:37:13 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Webmaster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1599 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>4th National Conference for Media Reform</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1578</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;dates&quot;&gt;
    &lt;p class=&quot;first&quot;&gt;
    &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;date-start&quot;&gt;June 6, 2008 - 10:00am  US/Central&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;date-separator&quot;&gt; to &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;date-end&quot;&gt;June 8, 2008 - 1:00pm  US/Central&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Minneapolis Convention Center&lt;br /&gt;
1301 2nd Ave. South&lt;br /&gt;
Minneapolis MN 55403&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Free Press is hosting its 4th National Conference for Media Reform, drawing 3,500 participants from across the country and world. Join us as we host policy makers, grassroots organizations, journalists, media experts, concerned citizens and many more! The conference will focus on five specific tracks: Media Policy; Journalism and Independent Media; Media Reform Activism and Movement Building; Civil Rights, Social Justice, and Media; and The Next Frontier.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For more information please visit: &lt;a href=&quot;http://freepress.net/conference&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://freepress.net/conference&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:51:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Webmaster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1578 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Text Messaging FUD Busting (Part I)</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1566</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Following the lead taken in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/user/2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Alex’s &lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1563&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blog post&lt;/a&gt; yesterday, I’m going to address some &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FUD&lt;/a&gt; which is making the rounds about text messaging and spam. This weekend, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com//&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ran an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/10/technology/10spam.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; talking about cell phone spam. Spam – or rather, the threat of spam – is a key argument used by the carriers who oppose our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/issues/text-message-petition&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;petition&lt;/a&gt; asking the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fcc.gov/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FCC&lt;/a&gt; to clarify that carriers may not discriminate in providing text messaging services. But don’t be fooled – the FUD thrown around in this article is irrelevant to the issues raised in the petition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1566&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1566#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/txtsms">TXT/SMS</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:18:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jef Pearlman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1566 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Maybe The FCC Can Handle The Truth</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1536</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe the FCC can handle the truth.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A couple of days ago, we asked the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1529&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;question&lt;/a&gt; whether the Federal Communications Commission was up for confronting the reality of Comcast’s blocking and throttling of peer-to-peer traffic and, if so, what the Commission would do about it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just as Jack Nicholson’s character, Col. Nathan Jessep, was arrested at the end of the movie, “A Few Good Men” after telling Tom Cruise’s character Lt. Daniel Kaffee the truth, it looks as if the Commission is preparing to take some action against Comcast.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;FCC Chairman Kevin Martin made his announcement in dramatic fashion at a Senate Commerce Committee hearing.  He wasn’t on the original agenda to testify.  Martin’s staff contacted the Committee the afternoon before the April 22 hearing and asked if he could testify.  Martin wanted to a big forum for a big announcement, and he made the most of it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1536&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1536#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:23:13 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Art Brodsky</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1536 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Boy Who Cried &quot;Spam&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1535</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have a nifty little service I buy from my telephone provider called &amp;#8220;teleblock.&amp;#8221;  It blocks calls originiating from certain types of phone calls unless I affirmatively allow them.  Thanks to this nifty service, I am once again able to sleep late on Sundays.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I bring this up because if there is a common carriage service left in the telecom world, it&amp;#8217;s plain old telephone service (POTS).  My POTS landline is absolutely regulated as a &amp;#8220;Title II&amp;#8221; common carrier telephone service.  But despite being a common carrier Title II telecom service, my POTS provider can offer me a very useful tool for limiting annoying calls.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1535&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1535#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/fcc">FCC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/net-neutrality">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/txtsms">TXT/SMS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/information-policy">Information Policy</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:56:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Harold Feld</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1535 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mobile carriers argue, “Problem Solved” and “Trust Us.” Public Knowledge replies, “No” and “No.” </title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1525</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;You may recall that last month we filed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1461&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;comments&lt;/a&gt; in the FCC’s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1353&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;proceeding&lt;/a&gt; on our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/issues/text-message-petition&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;text messaging petition&lt;/a&gt;.  We were joined by numerous other parties, including the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;American Civil Liberties Union&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rebtel.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rebtel&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defazio.house.gov/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Congressmen&lt;/a&gt;, and over 200 concerned individuals.  On the other side of the debate, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tmobile.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vzw.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;number&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.att.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;of&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metropcs.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ctia.org]&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;carriers&lt;/a&gt; weighed in as well.  The carriers’ main arguments? That the problem is solved, and that consumers are actually better off when the carriers get to decide who speaks and who doesn’t over text messages. Yesterday, we filed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/pdf/pk-etal-replies-20080414.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;reply comments&lt;/a&gt; addressing these arguments, and making it clear to the FCC that the problem has not been solved, and that it is unacceptable to have mobile carriers act as editors passing judgment on the content of text messages.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1525&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1525#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/txtsms">TXT/SMS</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:22:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jef Pearlman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1525 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Reply Comments of Public Knowledge et al.: Petition for Declaratory Ruling Stating that Text Messaging and Short Codes are Title</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1527</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This document is also available in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/pdf/pk-etal-replies-20080414.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PDF format&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Before the&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Washington, D.C. 20554&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the Matter of the Petition of Public Knowledge &lt;em&gt;et al.&lt;/em&gt; for Declaratory Ruling Stating that Text Messaging and Short Codes are Title II Services or are Title I Services Subject to Section 202 Nondiscrimination Rules.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;RM-_______&lt;br /&gt;
WT Docket No. 08-7&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;REPLY COMMENTS OF&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Public Knowledge, Free Press, Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union, EDUCAUSE, Media Access Project, New America Foundation, U.S. PIRG, Assemblyman Richard L. Brodsky, CREDO Mobile, Inc.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;April 14, 2008&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1527&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/taxonomy/term/92">FCC</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Webmaster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1527 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Public Knowledge and Advocacy Groups Urge FCC To Protect Text Messaging Rights</title>
 <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1520</link>
 <description>&lt;strong&gt;For Immediate Release: &lt;span class=&quot;date-single&quot;&gt;April 14, 2008&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Public Knowledge, joined by a prominent state legislator as well as consumer and public interest groups, told the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that regulators act to protect the rights of consumers to use text messaging without undue interference from wireless companies.  The FCC should also protect some wireless carriers from the anticompetitive behavior of others, Public Knowledge and groups filing with it said.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In addition, groups representing advocacy organizations and the disability community agreed that their access to texting remains in jeopardy unless the FCC acts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1520&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.publicknowledge.org/tag/txtsms">TXT/SMS</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:05:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Art Brodsky</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1520 at http://www.publicknowledge.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
