stdClass Object
(
[nid] => 6342
[type] => release
[language] =>
[uid] => 4
[status] => 1
[created] => 1320171532
[changed] => 1320171532
[comment] => 0
[promote] => 1
[moderate] => 0
[sticky] => 0
[tnid] => 0
[translate] => 0
[vid] => 6403
[revision_uid] => 4
[title] => Public Knowledge Heartened By Antitrust Ruling
[body] =>
U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, in an
antitrust cast brought by the U.S. Department of Justice, ruled yesterday that
H&R Block could not purchase another major manufacturer of tax-preparation
software.
The following is attributed to Harold Feld,
legal director for Public Knowledge:
“This case proves that antitrust law is
alive, well and relevant to AT&T’s proposed takeover of T-Mobile. The judge in the H&R Block case ruled
that one of the largest companies in a competitive industry could not buy out a
competitor, particularly when that competitor is seen as a maverick within that
industry.
“The judge agreed with the Justice
Department that a market dominated by the two biggest companies is not
sufficiently competitive. We agree. Whether the market is tax-filing software or
the wireless industry, the principles are the same.
“The fact that the opinion has not been
released because of the large amount of confidential data presented in court
filings means that those who on the surface think the Justice Department has a
weak case in the AT&T matter would do well to remember we don’t know all
that has been filed.”
[log] =>
[revision_timestamp] => 1320171532
[format] => 7
[name] => Art Brodsky
[picture] => files/pictures/picture-4.png
[data] => a:6:{s:7:"contact";i:0;s:10:"form_token";s:32:"8ccae93257cd5bd08279c4b915d339a4";s:14:"picture_delete";i:0;s:14:"picture_upload";s:0:"";s:15:"googleanalytics";a:1:{s:6:"custom";i:1;}s:14:"wysiwyg_status";a:1:{i:7;i:7;}}
[path] => public-knowledge-heartened-antitrust-ruling
[field_issue] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[nid] => 6116
[safe] => Array
(
[nid] => 6116
[title] => The AT&T/T-Mobile Merger
[status] => 1
)
[view] =>
The AT&T/T-Mobile Merger
)
)
[print_display] => 1
[print_display_comment] => 0
[print_display_urllist] => 1
[print_mail_display] => 1
[print_mail_display_comment] => 0
[print_mail_display_urllist] => 1
[print_pdf_display] => 1
[print_pdf_display_comment] => 0
[print_pdf_display_urllist] => 1
[last_comment_timestamp] => 1320171532
[last_comment_name] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[taxonomy] => Array
(
[163] => stdClass Object
(
[tid] => 163
[vid] => 5
[name] => Antitrust
[description] =>
[weight] => 0
)
[121] => stdClass Object
(
[tid] => 121
[vid] => 5
[name] => AT&T
[description] =>
[weight] => 0
)
)
[files] => Array
(
)
[page_title] =>
[nodewords] => Array
(
[abstract] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[canonical] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[copyright] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[description] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[keywords] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[revisit-after] => Array
(
[value] => 1
)
[robots] => Array
(
[value] => Array
(
[noarchive] => 0
[nofollow] => 0
[noindex] => 0
[noodp] => 0
[nosnippet] => 0
[noydir] => 0
)
[use_default] => 0
)
[dc.contributor] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[dc.creator] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[dc.date] => Array
(
[value] => Array
(
[month] => 11
[day] => 1
[year] => 2011
)
)
[dc.title] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[location] => Array
(
[latitude] =>
[longitude] =>
)
[pics-label] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
)
[build_mode] => 0
[readmore] => 1
[content] => Array
(
[print_links] => Array
(
[#weight] => -101
[#suffix] =>
[#value] =>
[#prefix] =>
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#printed] => 1
)
[field_issue] => Array
(
[#type_name] => release
[#context] => full
[#field_name] => field_issue
[#post_render] => Array
(
[0] => content_field_wrapper_post_render
)
[#weight] => -2
[field] => Array
(
[#description] =>
[items] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[#formatter] => default
[#node] => stdClass Object
*RECURSION*
[#type_name] => release
[#field_name] => field_issue
[#weight] => 0
[#theme] => nodereference_formatter_default
[#item] => Array
(
[nid] => 6116
[safe] => Array
(
[nid] => 6116
[title] => The AT&T/T-Mobile Merger
[status] => 1
)
[#delta] => 0
)
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#theme_used] => 1
[#printed] => 1
[#type] =>
[#value] =>
[#prefix] =>
[#suffix] =>
[#children] => The AT&T/T-Mobile Merger
)
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#children] => The AT&T/T-Mobile Merger
[#printed] => 1
)
[#single] => 1
[#attributes] => Array
(
)
[#required] =>
[#parents] => Array
(
)
[#tree] =>
[#context] => full
[#page] => 1
[#field_name] => field_issue
[#title] => Issues
[#access] => 1
[#label_display] => above
[#teaser] =>
[#node] => stdClass Object
*RECURSION*
[#type] => content_field
[#children] => The AT&T/T-Mobile Merger
[#printed] => 1
)
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#children] =>
[#printed] => 1
)
[body] => Array
(
[#weight] => -1
[#value] => U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, in an
antitrust cast brought by the U.S. Department of Justice, ruled yesterday that
H&R Block could not purchase another major manufacturer of tax-preparation
software.
The following is attributed to Harold Feld,
legal director for Public Knowledge:
“This case proves that antitrust law is
alive, well and relevant to AT&T’s proposed takeover of T-Mobile. The judge in the H&R Block case ruled
that one of the largest companies in a competitive industry could not buy out a
competitor, particularly when that competitor is seen as a maverick within that
industry.
“The judge agreed with the Justice
Department that a market dominated by the two biggest companies is not
sufficiently competitive. We agree. Whether the market is tax-filing software or
the wireless industry, the principles are the same.
“The fact that the opinion has not been
released because of the large amount of confidential data presented in court
filings means that those who on the surface think the Justice Department has a
weak case in the AT&T matter would do well to remember we don’t know all
that has been filed.”
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#printed] => 1
)
[#pre_render] => Array
(
[0] => content_alter_extra_weights
)
[#content_extra_fields] => Array
(
[title] => Array
(
[label] => Title
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => -5
)
[body_field] => Array
(
[label] => Body
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => -1
[view] => body
)
[revision_information] => Array
(
[label] => Revision information
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => 2
)
[author] => Array
(
[label] => Authoring information
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => 3
)
[options] => Array
(
[label] => Publishing options
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => 4
)
[comment_settings] => Array
(
[label] => Comment settings
[description] => Comment module form.
[weight] => 10
)
[menu] => Array
(
[label] => Menu settings
[description] => Menu module form.
[weight] => -3
)
[taxonomy] => Array
(
[label] => Taxonomy
[description] => Taxonomy module form.
[weight] => -4
)
[path] => Array
(
[label] => Path settings
[description] => Path module form.
[weight] => 8
)
[attachments] => Array
(
[label] => File attachments
[description] => Upload module form.
[weight] => 9
[view] => files
)
[itunes] => Array
(
[label] => iTunes feed information
[description] => iTunes specific information.
[weight] => 0
)
[path_redirect] => Array
(
[label] => URL redirects
[description] => Path redirect module listing
[weight] => 5
)
[print] => Array
(
[label] => Printer, e-mail and PDF versions
[description] => Print module form.
[weight] => 6
)
[xmlsitemap] => Array
(
[label] => XML sitemap
[description] => XML sitemap module form
[weight] => 7
)
[nodewords] => Array
(
[label] => Meta tags
[description] => Meta tags fieldset.
[weight] => 1
)
)
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#children] =>
U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell, in an
antitrust cast brought by the U.S. Department of Justice, ruled yesterday that
H&R Block could not purchase another major manufacturer of tax-preparation
software.
The following is attributed to Harold Feld,
legal director for Public Knowledge:
“This case proves that antitrust law is
alive, well and relevant to AT&T’s proposed takeover of T-Mobile. The judge in the H&R Block case ruled
that one of the largest companies in a competitive industry could not buy out a
competitor, particularly when that competitor is seen as a maverick within that
industry.
“The judge agreed with the Justice
Department that a market dominated by the two biggest companies is not
sufficiently competitive. We agree. Whether the market is tax-filing software or
the wireless industry, the principles are the same.
“The fact that the opinion has not been
released because of the large amount of confidential data presented in court
filings means that those who on the surface think the Justice Department has a
weak case in the AT&T matter would do well to remember we don’t know all
that has been filed.”
[#printed] => 1
)
[links] => Array
(
[print_html] => Array
(
[href] => print/6342
[title] => Printer-friendly version
[attributes] => Array
(
[title] => Display a printer-friendly version of this page.
[class] => print-page
[rel] => nofollow
)
[html] =>
[query] =>
)
)
)
