stdClass Object
(
[nid] => 6485
[type] => release
[language] =>
[uid] => 3459
[status] => 1
[created] => 1324068325
[changed] => 1324073787
[comment] => 0
[promote] => 1
[moderate] => 0
[sticky] => 0
[tnid] => 0
[translate] => 0
[vid] => 6546
[revision_uid] => 3459
[title] => Public Knowledge Urges Members to Examine Legitimate Concerns of SOPA
[body] =>
Following almost a day and a half of heated debate, the House Judiciary Committee adjourned its markup of the Stop Online Piracy Act, or SOPA. Movement on the legislation will pick back up when the House reconvenes at the end of January 2012.
The following statement is attributed to Sherwin Siy, deputy legal director of Public Knowledge:
“Throughout the markup process, there has been clear disagreement and misunderstanding among members themselves about what is in the bill, to say nothing of what it actually does.
“SOPA, as written, would threaten the functioning, freedom, and economic potential of the internet. We hope the members of the House Judiciary Committee take this break as an opportunity to carefully examine the legitimate concerns raised by the tech industry, cybersecurity experts, public interest groups, and human-rights organizations.”
[log] =>
[revision_timestamp] => 1324073787
[format] => 7
[name] => Katy Tasker
[picture] => files/pictures/picture-3459.png
[data] => a:6:{s:7:"contact";i:0;s:15:"googleanalytics";a:1:{s:6:"custom";i:1;}s:14:"picture_delete";i:0;s:14:"picture_upload";s:0:"";s:13:"form_build_id";s:37:"form-66da78a3d68000723cc608f250b717de";s:14:"wysiwyg_status";a:1:{i:7;i:7;}}
[path] => public-knowledge-urges-members-examine-legitimate-
[field_issue] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[nid] => 3465
[safe] => Array
(
[nid] => 3465
[title] => SOPA & PIPA
[status] => 1
)
[view] =>
SOPA & PIPA
)
)
[print_display] => 1
[print_display_comment] => 0
[print_display_urllist] => 1
[print_mail_display] => 1
[print_mail_display_comment] => 0
[print_mail_display_urllist] => 1
[print_pdf_display] => 1
[print_pdf_display_comment] => 0
[print_pdf_display_urllist] => 1
[last_comment_timestamp] => 1324073787
[last_comment_name] =>
[comment_count] => 0
[taxonomy] => Array
(
[321] => stdClass Object
(
[tid] => 321
[vid] => 5
[name] => SOPA
[description] => This bill, H.R. 3261, or "The Stop Online Piracy Act" (SOPA), is supposed to curb infringing websites by allowing the Department of Justice to block them, but—to add insult to injury—it doesn't even do that effectively. But don't even consider talking about the easy work-arounds, because the government can go after you for that.
Bellow you will find resources on how you can take action as well as our latest blog posts and analysis on the issue.
[weight] => 0
)
)
[files] => Array
(
)
[page_title] =>
[nodewords] => Array
(
[abstract] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[canonical] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[copyright] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[description] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[keywords] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[revisit-after] => Array
(
[value] => 1
)
[robots] => Array
(
[value] => Array
(
[noarchive] => 0
[nofollow] => 0
[noindex] => 0
[noodp] => 0
[nosnippet] => 0
[noydir] => 0
)
[use_default] => 0
)
[dc.contributor] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[dc.creator] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[dc.date] => Array
(
[value] => Array
(
[month] => 12
[day] => 16
[year] => 2011
)
)
[dc.title] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
[location] => Array
(
[latitude] =>
[longitude] =>
)
[pics-label] => Array
(
[value] =>
)
)
[build_mode] => 0
[readmore] =>
[content] => Array
(
[print_links] => Array
(
[#weight] => -101
[#suffix] =>
[#value] =>
[#prefix] =>
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#printed] => 1
)
[field_issue] => Array
(
[#type_name] => release
[#context] => full
[#field_name] => field_issue
[#post_render] => Array
(
[0] => content_field_wrapper_post_render
)
[#weight] => -2
[field] => Array
(
[#description] =>
[items] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[#formatter] => default
[#node] => stdClass Object
*RECURSION*
[#type_name] => release
[#field_name] => field_issue
[#weight] => 0
[#theme] => nodereference_formatter_default
[#item] => Array
(
[nid] => 3465
[safe] => Array
(
[nid] => 3465
[title] => SOPA & PIPA
[status] => 1
)
[#delta] => 0
)
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#theme_used] => 1
[#printed] => 1
[#type] =>
[#value] =>
[#prefix] =>
[#suffix] =>
[#children] => SOPA & PIPA
)
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#children] => SOPA & PIPA
[#printed] => 1
)
[#single] => 1
[#attributes] => Array
(
)
[#required] =>
[#parents] => Array
(
)
[#tree] =>
[#context] => full
[#page] => 1
[#field_name] => field_issue
[#title] => Issues
[#access] => 1
[#label_display] => above
[#teaser] =>
[#node] => stdClass Object
*RECURSION*
[#type] => content_field
[#children] => SOPA & PIPA
[#printed] => 1
)
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#children] =>
[#printed] => 1
)
[body] => Array
(
[#weight] => -1
[#value] => Following almost a day and a half of heated debate, the House Judiciary Committee adjourned its markup of the Stop Online Piracy Act, or SOPA. Movement on the legislation will pick back up when the House reconvenes at the end of January 2012.
The following statement is attributed to Sherwin Siy, deputy legal director of Public Knowledge:
“Throughout the markup process, there has been clear disagreement and misunderstanding among members themselves about what is in the bill, to say nothing of what it actually does.
“SOPA, as written, would threaten the functioning, freedom, and economic potential of the internet. We hope the members of the House Judiciary Committee take this break as an opportunity to carefully examine the legitimate concerns raised by the tech industry, cybersecurity experts, public interest groups, and human-rights organizations.”
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#printed] => 1
)
[#pre_render] => Array
(
[0] => content_alter_extra_weights
)
[#content_extra_fields] => Array
(
[title] => Array
(
[label] => Title
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => -5
)
[body_field] => Array
(
[label] => Body
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => -1
[view] => body
)
[revision_information] => Array
(
[label] => Revision information
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => 2
)
[author] => Array
(
[label] => Authoring information
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => 3
)
[options] => Array
(
[label] => Publishing options
[description] => Node module form.
[weight] => 4
)
[comment_settings] => Array
(
[label] => Comment settings
[description] => Comment module form.
[weight] => 10
)
[menu] => Array
(
[label] => Menu settings
[description] => Menu module form.
[weight] => -3
)
[taxonomy] => Array
(
[label] => Taxonomy
[description] => Taxonomy module form.
[weight] => -4
)
[path] => Array
(
[label] => Path settings
[description] => Path module form.
[weight] => 8
)
[attachments] => Array
(
[label] => File attachments
[description] => Upload module form.
[weight] => 9
[view] => files
)
[itunes] => Array
(
[label] => iTunes feed information
[description] => iTunes specific information.
[weight] => 0
)
[path_redirect] => Array
(
[label] => URL redirects
[description] => Path redirect module listing
[weight] => 5
)
[print] => Array
(
[label] => Printer, e-mail and PDF versions
[description] => Print module form.
[weight] => 6
)
[xmlsitemap] => Array
(
[label] => XML sitemap
[description] => XML sitemap module form
[weight] => 7
)
[nodewords] => Array
(
[label] => Meta tags
[description] => Meta tags fieldset.
[weight] => 1
)
)
[#title] =>
[#description] =>
[#children] =>
Following almost a day and a half of heated debate, the House Judiciary Committee adjourned its markup of the Stop Online Piracy Act, or SOPA. Movement on the legislation will pick back up when the House reconvenes at the end of January 2012.
The following statement is attributed to Sherwin Siy, deputy legal director of Public Knowledge:
“Throughout the markup process, there has been clear disagreement and misunderstanding among members themselves about what is in the bill, to say nothing of what it actually does.
“SOPA, as written, would threaten the functioning, freedom, and economic potential of the internet. We hope the members of the House Judiciary Committee take this break as an opportunity to carefully examine the legitimate concerns raised by the tech industry, cybersecurity experts, public interest groups, and human-rights organizations.”
[#printed] => 1
)
[links] => Array
(
[print_html] => Array
(
[href] => print/6485
[title] => Printer-friendly version
[attributes] => Array
(
[title] => Display a printer-friendly version of this page.
[class] => print-page
[rel] => nofollow
)
[html] =>
[query] =>
)
)
)
