Public Knowledge Fights for Your Right to Watch TV the Way You Want
Public Knowledge Fights for Your Right to Watch TV the Way You Want
Public Knowledge Fights for Your Right to Watch TV the Way You Want

    Get Involved Today

    Public Knowledge wants to protect viewers’ right to have
    control over how they watch TV. But some major broadcasters are trying to take
    that control away from you. They’ve turned to the courts to stall innovation
    and shut down services that give users control. PK has been fighting back.

    On Friday, PK (with EFF and CEA) filed an amicus
    defending Aereo in a suit some broadcasters brought against it. Aereo
    makes it easier for people to watch free, over-the-air TV—something that has
    become more challenging for some after the broadcast transition to clearer, but
    less reliable, digital signals. The broadcasters want to argue changing the
    location of an individual antenna from on top of a TV or a roof is illegal, and
    that Aereo’s “remote antenna” system should be shut down.

    Our brief makes three arguments. First, broadcasters are special; they use
    subsidized public airwaves, and broadcasters’ attempts to shut down Aereo, a
    service that the public essentially subsidizes, is improper. People have a
    right to watch free TV without getting a license from the broadcasters. Second,
    the transmissions that Aereo facilitates are private performances that do not
    require the permission of the copyright holder—this is a technical legal
    question, but if the broadcasters had their way, cloud music services, consumer
    devices, and even some in-home uses of recorded content could become illegal.
    Third, because this is an appeal of a preliminary injunction ruling—that is,
    Aereo has not yet had a full trial—the Court should carefully consider the
    public interest, and the fact that Aereo is causing the broadcasters no real

    In addition to our Aereo brief, a few weeks PK filed an amicus brief in the Fox v. DISH case in California.
    (Admittedly, we did file it a little late—but the case, and related ones, are
    ongoing.) There, we defended viewers’ right to record programming, and to skip
    commercials when they play it back. This has been legal for decades, and there
    is no reason it should be changed.

    We have also testified
    before Congress
    , arguing for policy changes that would increase competition
    and innovation, allowing TV to catch up with other areas of consumer
    technology. We even put out a whitepaper on the subject.

    The big screen in your living room has not kept up with the technological
    changes that have drastically improved the little screen in your purse or
    pocket. This is due, in part, to some incumbent companies who think they
    should control every last aspect of the viewing experience. PK will continue to
    do whatever it can to make sure viewers have control over how they watch TV.