Senate Commerce Committee to FCC, “The Game is Changing. Are We Keeping Up?”
Senate Commerce Committee to FCC, “The Game is Changing. Are We Keeping Up?”
Senate Commerce Committee to FCC, “The Game is Changing. Are We Keeping Up?”

    Get Involved Today

    Tuesday, the Senate Commerce Committee held its first FCC oversight hearing of
    the year.  All 5 Commissioners attended and Senators discussed their
    laundry list of priorities and pet projects.  While Chairman Jay Rockefeller
    (D-WV) pressed hard on funding for FirstNet, there were several other topics important
    to the public interest addressed in the hearing.

    phone unlocking has dominated the tech news over the last few weeks.  The
    backlash over the Library of Congress’s refusal to exempt phone unlocking from
    the DMCA prompted an official White House response to a “We the People”
    petition, and since this is a DMCA-related issue, PK
    also had a few things to say on the matter
    .  So did the
    Senate.  Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) promoted
    her Wireless Consumer Choice Act legislation,
    which she co-authored with Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Sen. Mike Lee

    agrees with Sen. Klobuchar’s comments that the recent Library of Congress
    decision creates uncertainty for consumers who want to unlock their cell phones
    to switch networks and that this is an opportunity for Congress to act.  However, we believe that this problem is best
    addressed through a fix in copyright law. 
    As we’ve stated earlier, a cell phone-only fix wouldn’t help in other
    circumstances “where an incumbent tried to lock consumers into their own ecosystems
    and lock out competitors” such as universal garage door openers, generic inkjet
    cartridges, or game consoles unable to play used games.  Commissioners Pai and Rosenworcel
    acknowledged the problem and expressed interest in working with Congress on
    this issue, but it was reassuring to hear them mention the copyright angle in
    their responses to Sen. Klobuchar’s questioning.

    senators referenced the notion of regulations not keeping up with technology.  As Sen. Dan Coates (R-IN) stated, Congress
    passes “laws and regulations that are out of date before they even get enacted.”  One could infer a couple of policy
    implications from this overall sentiment.  The first is the phone network upgrade from
    traditional phone technology to an all-IP network.  Chairman Genachowski’s response to Sen.
    Coates’s question mentioned the FCC has “focused on some of the enduring
    principles in this space that remain consistent even as technology
    changes.  One is, make sure we have an
    infrastructure to support the new economy. 
    The second is principles like universal service, and competition, and
    public safety.”  The Chairman should have
    just come on out and said “let’s talk about the PSTN transition.”  We welcome this conversation, and believe
    that the FCC should
    develop a framework
    for this transition. 
    PK’s Five
    Fundamentals of the PSTN
    establishes a strong public interest foundation
    for this framework and ensures that consumers will not be left behind as the US
    upgrades its telecommunications infrastructure.

    second area of technology and the telecom marketplace outpacing regulations
    involves video reform.  Commissioner Pai acknowledged that the US has
    seen a “fundamental change” in the video marketplace.  The rules
    established by the 1992 Cable Act need thorough review and
    revision.  Nowhere is this more applicable than with retransmission
    consent rules.  The retransmission consent system governs the
    carriage of broadcast stations by cable television systems–the rules say that
    cable systems need to get permission from broadcasters to carry broadcast
    programs, including programs that the broadcaster itself create.  This
    system was designed to ensure that broadcasters continued to have a place at a
    time when cable was quickly becoming the dominant force in video content
    delivery, to ensure that they could produce locally-oriented programming and
    respond to community needs.

    rules may have made sense in the early 1990s, when cable was gaining ground and
    no rival was in sight.  Today, while cable is still quite dominant,
    more people subscribe to video service from satellite providers, telecom
    companies (like AT&T and Verizon), or even “cut the cord” and get
    their content online.  Broadcasters and groups of broadcasters,
    instead of using the retransmission consent system to help fund local content,
    are instead holding viewers hostage, blacking out their signals, and demanding
    high payments for carriage.  Along with other problems, the
    retransmission consent system is a contributor to steeply rising cable

    policymakers are beginning to recognize the consumer harms that result from
    this outdated set of rules.  Commissioner Rosenworcel acknowledged
    this change and the effects it has on consumers.  “Both as a consumer
    and as someone who sits in a regulatory position, I think that’s a problem and
    I think it’s something that merits a fresh look.”   Sen. Blumenthal raised the blackout issue as
    it relates to sports programming and retransmission consent and Chairman Genochowski believes it may
    be time to update the retransmission consent provisions to reduce the chance of
    blackouts during future negotiations.  This is a conversation that
    needs to happen.

    this was the first Commerce Committee hearing after the announcement of Sen.
    Mark Pryor (D-AR) as Communications, Technology, and the Internet Subcommittee
    Chairman.  Earlier this week, Sen. Pryor
    laid out his subcommittee agenda for the next few months that will feature four
    “State of” information-gathering hearings on wireless communications, wired
    communications, video, and rural communications.  These hearings will be welcome opportunities
    to continue the conversations started (video reform through retransmission
    consent) and initiate conversations left to be had (like the PSTN transition) from
    Tuesday’s hearing.