The Longstanding FCC Problem with Transparency on the Disposition of Petitions
The Longstanding FCC Problem with Transparency on the Disposition of Petitions
The Longstanding FCC Problem with Transparency on the Disposition of Petitions

    Get Involved Today

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.– 1st AMENDMENT

    —————

    The right to petition the federal government is one guaranteed by the 1st Amendment and the APA (5 U.S.C. 553(e)). FCC has implemented this requirement with 47 C.F.R. 1.401. But all this means nothing if petitions fall into an administrative black hole where they can not be seen, let alone acted on!

    On January 2010 an FCC public notice (PN) asked for comment on 3 petitions for rulemaking and 2 petitions for declaratory rulings.  The oldest petition involved was almost 5 years old when the PN was released.  All these petitions arrive prior to the current Chairman. This is a longstanding problem going back more than a decade.

    Corporate merger review by FCC is not a constitutional right nor does it have a statutory schedule.  Yet FCC has a clear goal for dealing with corporate mergers and a transparent tracking webpageDoesn't the contitutionally protected and statutory right to petition require just as much transparency?

    I did some discreet inquiries after this PN was issued and was surprised to find out that 8th Floor staffers do not have routine access to lists of petitions that have been filed or even petitions that are siting with action x months after filing. It as not even clear if the Chairman’s Office has routine access to this information. Petitions apparently go to bureaus and offices and just sit around until someone decides to act on them – or not. One always has the options of going to the District Court and asking for a writ of mandamus, but that is possibly the only option. Since the existence of these petitions can be secret, it is difficult for interested 3rd parties to find out about them and try to pressure/embarrass the Commission into acting.

    Some modest suggestions:

    1. The Commission create an internal tracking systems for such petitions and report all filings to all commissioners within a month of filing.

    2. The Commission create a public tracking system, analogous to the FCC Items on Circulation webpage, that documents all petitions more than 3 months old that have not been acted on and makes the text available for public inspection. This need not be a PN requesting comment, just an acknowledgement that the petition has been filed and is under review.