USTR Still Missing the Point
USTR Still Missing the Point
USTR Still Missing the Point

    Get Involved Today

    Yesterday, I attended the Senate Finance Committee Hearing
    on the President’s 2012 Trade Agenda. United States Trade
    Representative Ambassador Ron Kirk was the sole witness and testified on behalf
    of the Administration. The hearing was an opportunity for UTSR to soothe public
    concerns and address the recent scrutiny it’s received for the secretive
    negotiation process surrounding
    negotiations. Instead the USTR failed to seriously address the lack of
    public input within negotiations.  

    Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) questioned the Administration’s
    commitment to transparency by highlighting constituent concerns over being shut
    out of a process that affects the Internet in the Administration’s efforts to
    combat intellectual property theft. Kirk assured members that TPP contained no
    provisions that would prevent the free flow of information, even though a leaked text suggests it would do just that.
    It seemed that Wyden and Kirk were having two different conversations, as Kirk
    denied the connection between ACTA and TPP on the one hand, and the now stalled
    SOPA/PIPA legislation on the other. Wyden illustrated how they were similar
    because the public felt shut out from both processes. Dismissing the public as
    misinformed for wanting to be a part of the process illustrates how
    disconnected from public opinion the USTR is.

    Kirk defended the negotiation process as one of the most
    open, highlighting over 350 consultations with Congress, and many more with
    stake holders, stating that any provisions within the TPP would follow
    guidelines set forth by the DMCA. The problem here is the definition of “stake
    holder”. The USTR seems to think that only corporate interests can be
    “stakeholders” as shown by the current membership of the advisory committee
    responsible for advising the USTR. These members include only corporate
    representatives who received a security clearance to participate. There is no
    public interest representation within the committee. The public has also been
    denied access to relevant documents that are classified as confidential.

    Public interest representation is important because the
    Internet has no single representative; it is a public resource and a powerful tool for innovation. The public
    deserves to be heard when international agreements or US law would affect the
    Internet. SOPA and PIPA did not allow such input. And the TPP continues to make
    that same mistake.

    I understand that the United States may not be able to lay
    all its cards on the table during a complex negotiation process; but I do
    expect to receive meaningful information about the USTR’s activities. I
    think Kirk should add inclusion to his list of guiding principles. At
    yesterday’s hearing, he missed an opportunity to do so and soothe over any
    concern over its negotiation process.